<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strategic Operations &#8211; Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scrapyardarmory.com/2008/12/18/strategic-operations-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scrapyardarmory.com/2008/12/18/strategic-operations-review/</link>
	<description>A BattleTech weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.scrapyardarmory.com/2008/12/18/strategic-operations-review/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrapyardarmory.com/?p=508#comment-388</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Dan!  I&#039;ll be glad to add you to my blogroll as well if you don&#039;t mind.  Just give me till after the holidays to sort out a few things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Dan!  I&#8217;ll be glad to add you to my blogroll as well if you don&#8217;t mind.  Just give me till after the holidays to sort out a few things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.scrapyardarmory.com/2008/12/18/strategic-operations-review/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrapyardarmory.com/?p=508#comment-379</guid>
		<description>Nice review Brian. I was going to buy it anyway of course, but now I&#039;m really looking forward to it.

Also, I thought you would like to know I added you to my blogroll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review Brian. I was going to buy it anyway of course, but now I&#8217;m really looking forward to it.</p>
<p>Also, I thought you would like to know I added you to my blogroll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quigs</title>
		<link>http://www.scrapyardarmory.com/2008/12/18/strategic-operations-review/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>quigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrapyardarmory.com/?p=508#comment-375</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I remember the trouble you were having trying to get the broken rules they printed out to work, and TPTB response being &quot;Use your imagination and fill in the blanks.&quot; 

Gee, thanks jackass. Next time they wonder why the battletech torrent gets bigger with the release, they should use their imagination and fill in the blanks where their money used to be coming in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I remember the trouble you were having trying to get the broken rules they printed out to work, and TPTB response being &#8220;Use your imagination and fill in the blanks.&#8221; </p>
<p>Gee, thanks jackass. Next time they wonder why the battletech torrent gets bigger with the release, they should use their imagination and fill in the blanks where their money used to be coming in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.scrapyardarmory.com/2008/12/18/strategic-operations-review/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrapyardarmory.com/?p=508#comment-374</guid>
		<description>You are probably close.  The Combat Ops material with the Miniatures rules don&#039;t really take all that much room in the book.  I doubt that Interstellar Ops would fit in that space if they were left out.

That said, Interstellar Ops has to do a better job refreshing the Combat Ops Inner Sphere in Flames rules.  I&#039;m going to be bummed if they screw that up like they did the linked scenarios.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are probably close.  The Combat Ops material with the Miniatures rules don&#8217;t really take all that much room in the book.  I doubt that Interstellar Ops would fit in that space if they were left out.</p>
<p>That said, Interstellar Ops has to do a better job refreshing the Combat Ops Inner Sphere in Flames rules.  I&#8217;m going to be bummed if they screw that up like they did the linked scenarios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quigs</title>
		<link>http://www.scrapyardarmory.com/2008/12/18/strategic-operations-review/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Quigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrapyardarmory.com/?p=508#comment-373</guid>
		<description>So basically what I said a year ago, with the product not needing to be split over 2 books, and filled with re-used sections of combat ops. Awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically what I said a year ago, with the product not needing to be split over 2 books, and filled with re-used sections of combat ops. Awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

